Skip to content
Comparison

Optimate vs CoSchedule

CoSchedule is a marketing calendar and social scheduler that puts blog, email and social on one editorial calendar, aimed at content marketing teams.

We make this comparison as a competitor, so read it with that in mind. Everything below is checked against CoSchedule’s own published pricing, and the sections where CoSchedule is the better choice are real ones — not throat-clearing.

Who each one is for

Choose CoSchedule if…

Content teams that want their whole marketing calendar — blog, email, campaigns and social — in one place, and treat social scheduling as one strand of a bigger editorial workflow.

Choose Optimate if…

Businesses and agencies focused specifically on producing and scheduling on-brand social content, who don't need a blog/email calendar wrapped around it.

Pricing side by side

Each product is shown in the currency it actually bills in. We deliberately don’t convert these into one currency — the rate moves, and a converted figure would misrepresent what CoSchedule charges.

Optimate

Free
£0
14-day Pro trial, then 3 social profiles, 5 AI generations
Pro
£29
per month, 10 social profiles, 1 brand
Studio
£59
per month, 15 profiles, up to 3 clients
Agency
£135
per month, 50 profiles, unlimited clients
Enterprise
Contact us
beyond 50 profiles

CoSchedule

Starter
$29
1 seat, 3 social profiles — billed yearly; $39 monthly; +$5 per extra profile
Professional
$49
2 seats, 5 social profiles — billed yearly; $59 monthly
Suite
From $69
unlimited seats and profiles

Checked against CoSchedule’s published pricing on 9 September 2026. Verify on CoSchedule’s pricing page

Feature by feature

Unified marketing calendar

Optimate
Social calendar and planner
CoSchedule
Blog, email, campaigns and social on one calendar

AI content generation

Optimate
Brand-kit-driven per brand
CoSchedule
AI writing tools, prompt-based

AI image generation

Optimate
Included from Pro
CoSchedule
Not a headline feature

X / Twitter cost

Optimate
Included in your profiles
CoSchedule
Billed separately at $16 per profile/month

Cost at 5 profiles

Optimate
£29/mo (Pro, 10 profiles)
CoSchedule
$49/mo (Professional, 5) before any X surcharge

Marketing project management

Optimate
Not a focus
CoSchedule
Tasks, workflows, team project management

Where CoSchedule is the better choice

These are real limitations of Optimate, not softened ones. If any of them is a dealbreaker for you, CoSchedule is the right answer.

One calendar for all of marketing

CoSchedule's whole point is putting blog, email, campaigns and social on a single editorial calendar. If social is just one strand of a broader content operation, that unified view is something Optimate deliberately doesn't try to be.

Project management built in

Tasks, workflows and team assignments make CoSchedule as much a marketing project manager as a scheduler. For teams that live in that structure, it's a real advantage.

Cheap entry for a content team

Starter is $29/month. For a small content team already using CoSchedule's calendar, adding social there beats running a second tool.

Where Optimate is the better choice

Content generated on-brand

CoSchedule schedules and coordinates content you produce. Optimate generates it — captions and images against a per-brand kit — so it addresses the make-the-content problem, not just the organise-it one.

X isn't an extra bill

CoSchedule bills Twitter/X separately at $16 per profile per month on top of your plan. On Optimate, X is one of your included profiles — a real cost difference if X matters to you.

More profiles without per-profile fees

CoSchedule's lower tiers include 3–5 profiles and charge $5 for each extra. Optimate Pro includes 10 in a flat £29, and Studio 15 — cheaper as you add accounts.

Common questions

Is Optimate a good CoSchedule alternative?

If you mainly want on-brand social content produced and scheduled, yes. If you specifically want blog, email and social on one marketing calendar with project management, CoSchedule is built for that and Optimate isn't.

Does CoSchedule charge extra for Twitter/X?

Yes — X profiles are billed separately at $16 per profile per month on top of your plan. On Optimate, X counts as one of your included profiles.

Which is cheaper?

It depends on X and profile count. For a few non-X profiles CoSchedule Starter ($29) is close; once you add X's $16/profile surcharge or more accounts, Optimate's flat tiers pull ahead.

Try it against your own accounts

Every account starts with a 14-day trial of Pro, with no card required — enough to judge the content quality against whatever you use today. After that the free plan covers 3 social profiles and 5 AI generations.

Start free